Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McDonald v. Jackson et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Plaintiff:
David McDonald
Defendant:
Karl Jackson and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Weathers v. McDonald et al
as 2:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Larell Martin Weathers
Defendant:
David McDonald, Michael Bowman and Sacramento Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOYLE v. CROZIER et al
as 2:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS AUSTIN HOYLE
Defendant:
PATRICK A. CROZIER, DAVID TYLER, THOMAS SCARPATO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Russell et al
as 7:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Officer Maddy, Officer Brown, Captain Booher and others
Plaintiff:
Rashan K. Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Russell et al
as 7:2021cv00019
Defendant:
Officer Maddy, Grievance Officer L. Helmick, Wellpath Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pshawn Oliver, Donald Peoples, Walter Patrick and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Donna Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Holt et al
as 3:2019cv00455
Plaintiff:
Pshawn Oliver, Kedrick Carwell, Audarius Watts and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker
Petitioner:
Anthonhy Draine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Mays et al
as 3:2019cv00406
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Tony Mays, Cpl. Robin Fish and others
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett and David McDonald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorick et al v. A'Viands LLC
as 2:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Brian Lorick , Carlus Anderson , Heirbrane Foster and others
Defendant:
A'Viands LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David McDonald v. Michael Daly
as 16-16893
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID MCDONALD
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL DALY, Chief Probation Officer, County of Marin probation Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
