Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Mediatechnics Systmes, Inc. et al v. Wordtech Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc00041
Plaintiff:
Mediatechnics Systmes, Inc. and Richard D. Wilson
Defendant:
Wordtech Systems, Inc. , Copypro, Inc. , David Miller and others
United States of America et al v. David Miller, LLC
as 2:2010cv02429
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Tennessee
Defendant:
David Miller, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
MacDonald v. Agacinski et al
as 2:2010cv11646
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. MacDonald
Defendant:
Robert L. Agacinski, Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, Attorney Discipline Board and others
David Miller
as 2:2009cr20174
Defendant:
David Miller
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Mullet et al v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department/Office et al
as 2:2008cv00857
Plaintiff:
Samuel Mullet, Wilma Mullet-Troyer, Lizzie Mullet and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department/Office, Fred Abdalla, Jr., Ronald Rouse and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leaf Funding, Inc. v. Wag Freight, Inc. et al
as 5:2008cv01120
Plaintiff:
Leaf Funding, Inc., Leaf Funding, Inc. and Leaf Funding, Inc.
Defendant:
Wag Freight, Inc. and David Miller, Sr.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Miller v. SSA
as 6:2008cv00122
Plaintiff:
David Miller
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Glaxosmithkline PLC et al
as 2:2007cv02723
Plaintiff:
David Miller, David Miller and David Miller
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline PLC and Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Potter v. Sator et al
as 3:2007cv01000
Plaintiff:
Gregory Potter
Defendant:
Inocentes Sator and David Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Sator et al
as 3:2007mc00109
Plaintiff:
Gregory Potter
Defendant:
Inocentes Sator and David Miller
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
