Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Moore et al v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv00600
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Moore and David Moore, Sr.
Defendant: Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Woodson v. Rowe et al
as 5:2022cv00060
Plaintiff: Marcus D Woodson
Defendant: Sheriff Kelly Rowe, Five Star Food Service, Well Path Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David MooreIn re: David Moore
as 21-60609
Petitioner: In re: David Moore
Moore v. McClure
as 3:2021cv00455
Plaintiff: David Moore
Defendant: Marc McClure
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore et al v. FedNat Insurance Co
as 2:2021cv01263
Special Master: Cade Richard Cole and Patrick A Juneau, Jr
Defendant: FedNat Insurance Company and FedNat Insurance Co
Plaintiff: David Moore and Kelli Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Fleming v. City of Byram, Mississippi et al
as 3:2019cv00531
Defendant: Aldermen Richard Cook, City of Byram, Mississippi, Aldermen Charlie Campbell and others
Plaintiff: Melinda Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hubbard v. Navagis, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00098
Defendant: David Moore, Navagis, Inc. and Michael Howard
Plaintiff: Ben Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Helena Agri-Enterprises L L C v. Moore
as 3:2019cv00408
Defendant: David Moore
Plaintiff: Helena Agri-Enterprises L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Shah et al
as 3:2018cv00111
Plaintiff: David Moore
Defendant: Azki Shah and Timothy Hutson Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Strong et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00297
Defendant: Kelly Strong and Schmidt
Plaintiff: David Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?