Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
David Nathan v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03052
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David Nathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TABLADA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71806
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID NATHAN TABLADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
NATHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20151
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID NATHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Johnson v. Seth Abel, et al
as 19-3774
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTINE LI, BRIAN LOUIS MANNION, CHRISTOPHER G. BLACK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Abel et al.
as 2:2019cv02865
Defendant:
Robert Francis O'Connor, John H. Spellman, Arthur Henry Hopwood, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson and Robert W. Johnson, r
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gillespie et al v. Dring et al
as 3:2015cv00950
Plaintiff:
Marjorie M. Gillespie , Thomas J. Gillespie, Jr. , Marie Barge and others
Defendant:
Lori Dring and Nancy Asaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NGUYEN v. GARY
as 2:2015cv01426
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY HOANG NGUYEN
Defendant:
DAVID NATHAN GARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $22,200.00 In Money Gram Money Orders
as 3:2013cv01392
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$22,200.00 In Money Gram Money Orders
Claimant:
David Nathan
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
