Cases 1 - 10 of 123
David Patterson v. USA, et al
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATTERSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Small Business / Self Employed Division and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bolen et al
as 2:2024cv10474
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Maverick Bolen, David Patterson, Caroline Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Patterson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Matthew David Patterson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scalable Insights, LLC et al v. Bihrle Applied Research, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Scalable Insights, LLC and David Patterson
Defendant:
Bihrle Applied Research, Inc., American Robotics, Inc. and Ondas Holdings, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Bar Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Patterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv02024
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
David Patterson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Patterson v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
David Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Markel v. Wittenbrock et al
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MARKEL
Defendant:
TODD WITTENBROCK, DR. JIM LALLY, MATADOR VENTURES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
David PattersonIn re: David Patterson
as 22-5683
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID PATTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
