Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hoefelman v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2022cv01216
Plaintiff:
David Ralph Hoefelman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HEIDKE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12696
Plaintiff:
DAVID RALPH HEIDKE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervrain et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fridelyne Maisoneuve, Roselaine Clerval and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Shelith Hansbro, Michael R. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEGGIE-BERNARD v. RUSSELL PLYWOOD INC. et al
as 2:2021cv13538
Plaintiff:
CHANDRA MEGGIE-BERNARD
Defendant:
RUSSELL PLYWOOD INC. and DAVID RALPH RAMIEREZ
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Solon Phillips v. Maryland Bd of Law Examiners
as 21-1218
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN A. AZRAEL, MATTHEW MILLS, JOHN F. MUDD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLON PHILLIPS
David Ambrose v. Michael O'Brien, et al
as 20-36078
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA MCCOLLOUGH, MICHAEL O'BRIEN and DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID RALPH AMBROSE
Phillips v. Maryland Board of Law Examiners et al
as 1:2020cv00583
Defendant:
Matthew Mills, David Ralph, Jonathan Azrael and others
Plaintiff:
Solon Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solon Phillips v. MD Board of Law Examiners
as 20-1057
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN A. AZRAEL, MATTHEW MILLS, JOHN F. MUDD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOLON PHILLIPS
Phillips v. Maryland Board of Law Examiners et al
as 1:2019cv02427
Defendant:
Matthew Mills, David Ralph, Jonathan Azrael and others
Plaintiff:
Solon Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
