Cases 1 - 10 of 16
CraneTech Inc v. Richardson et al
as 2:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
CraneTech Inc
Defendant:
Adam David Richardson and Northwest Integrity Crane LLC
Gary West, et al v. KY Horse Racing Commission, et al
as 19-6333
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS A. HENDRICKSON, Member of Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, J. DAVID RICHARDSON, M.D., Member of Kentucky Horse Racing Commission, TYLER PICKLESIMER, Churchill Downs Steward and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY WEST and GARY WEST
USA v. Jermaine Richardson
as 19-30201
Defendant / Appellant:
JERMAINE DAVID RICHARDSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Couri v. Pavia
as 19-2442
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Wooten, JSC/Kings, Riverside County District Attorney Office, John Does, 1-15 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Couri
Couri v. Pavia
as 19-2260
Defendant / Appellee:
UW Hospital, Paul Wooten, JSC/Kings, Riverside County District Attorney Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Couri
Couri v. Pavia et al
as 1:2019cv05436
Defendant:
ADA Garrett Behrens, Sulmeyer Kupetz, Dan Angers and others
Plaintiff:
James Couri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. David Richardson
as 16-6660
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RICHARDSON, a/k/a Kerry Webber, a/k/a Dad, a/k/a Dakim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: Craig Alford
as 14-1296
Petitioner:
In re: CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Pro Se Respondent:
WICKY CHOEUM and DAVID RICHARDSON
Nominal Respondent:
JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Craig Alford
as 14-1341
Petitioner:
In re: CRAIG ALFORD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Pro Se Respondent:
WICKY CHOEUM and DAVID RICHARDSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
