Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Kiontae Mack v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIONTAE MACK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, PAUL MADERER, Detective, Star No. 21246, DAVID ROBERTS, Detective, Star No. 20764 and others
Bentz v. Manton et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Defendant:
. Manton, . Huston, M Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNY v. BOWLING et al
as 2:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBERT DENNY
Defendant:
TYLER BOWLING and JOSH PAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Approximately $6800 US Currency et al
as 1:2021cv00444
Defendant:
Approximately $4370 US Currency from Associated Bank Safe-Deposit Box Number 104 and Approximately $6800 US Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
David Roberts
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
David Bentz v. Nathan Maue, et al
as 21-1379
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM QUALLS, MICHAEL SCHNICKER, NATHAN MAUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Bentz v. Stewart et al
as 3:2020cv01121
Defendant:
Patricia Stewart and John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bentz v. Kirk et al
as 3:2020cv01120
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Susan Kirk, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bentz v. Mike Moldenhauser, et al
as 20-1937
Defendant / Appellee:
HOLLY HAWKINS, MIKE MOLDENHAUSER, ERIN MEARS-ATTIG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
David Bentz v. Donald Lindenberg, et al
as 19-2564
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD LINDENBERG, C/O, Menard CC, JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, Assistant Warden, Menard CC and VIRGIL SMITH, C/O, Menard CC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ROBERT BENTZ
Bentz v. Mears et al
as 3:2019cv00799
Defendant:
J. Shemedy, C/O Hanson, Susan Kirk and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
