Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Hendrix v. Clark County Public Defender Office et al
as 3:2014cv00398
Defendant:
Clark County District Attorney Office, Clark County Public Defender Office, Mary Kay Holthus and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Roger et al
as 2:2014cv01244
Plaintiff:
Collis Martin
Defendant:
Charls Martinousky, Metro Police and David Roger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VAN DYKE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PREACHER PRO SE WRITER ATTORNEY AT LAW DENNIS ROGER VAN DYKE
Defendant:
ROGER JAMES DAVIS, BRUSE BURGER, CHARLES VANCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2014cv00352
Defendant:
Thomas M. Carroll, Edward B. Hughes, Chad Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Dyke v. Abernathy et al
as 5:2014ct03124
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
Wayne Abernathy, Kent W. Brown, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burdick v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2014cv00075
Defendant:
Nancy L. Alf, Mr. Hartsell, Mrs. Marsh and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Burdick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mortensbak v. Butler et al
as 3:2013cv03026
Plaintiff:
David Roger Mortensbak
Defendant:
Nicholas Butler, Paul Wayne Smersrud, McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Hill v. Warden
as 13-7108
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID ROGERS HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Chipeta v. Tagliatti et al
as 3:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
Pachalo C. Chipeta
Defendant:
Sharon Dickinson, Edward Kane, Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Warden
as 7:2012cv00520
Petitioner:
David Roger Hill
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
