Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Isbell v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2021cv00368
Defendant:
Donald Valenza, James Brazier and Jason Smoak
Plaintiff:
David Scott Isbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Carter et al
as 5:2020cv00864
Defendant:
Russell Eason, Lee Carter and Winston County Circuit Court
Plaintiff:
David Scott Frost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Moore et al
as 6:2020cv00517
Plaintiff:
David Scott Frost
Defendant:
James Wittman and Hoyt Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Winston County Alabama Jail & Court System
as 6:2019cv01319
Defendant:
Winston County Alabama Jail & Court System, Warden and Sheriff Tommy Moore
Plaintiff:
David Scott Frost
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmers Insurance Exchange et al v. Gordon et al
as 3:2019cv00163
Defendant:
David Scott Gordon and Cornerstone Insurance & Financial Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Farmers New World Life Insurance Company, Farmers Insurance Exchange, Fire Insurance Exchange and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Dase et al
as 4:2018cv00501
Defendant:
Walter D Dase, Anita J Dase, David Scott Dase and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Gafford v. Federal Defender et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00577
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Federal Defender and Cecilia Vaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. QCHC Medical Service et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2017cv00550
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
QCHC Medical Service and Dr. Chilli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gafford v. Gordon (INMATE 3)
as 2:2017cv00533
Plaintiff:
David Scott Gafford
Defendant:
Dante Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
