Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Kirby et al v. Ozark Nursing Home, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02231
Plaintiff:
Catherine Kirby and Jennifer Tillman
Defendant:
Ozark Nursing Home, Inc. , David Shaffer , Don Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Leaphart v. Detroit Housing Commission et al
as 2:2012cv13960
Plaintiff:
Kirk Leaphart
Defendant:
Detroit Housing Commission and David Shaffer
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2012cv00001
Plaintiff:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brenda Shaffer, David Shaffer, Ray Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
David Shaffer v. F. Gonzale
as 12-15010
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID SHAFFER
Respondent - Appellee:
F. GONZALES, Warden
David Shaffer et al v. Argent Mortgage Company LLC et al
as 2:2011cv03535
Defendant:
Argent Mortgage Company LLC, Does, National Default Servicing Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Shaffer and Claudia Sommer
Shaffer v. Gonzales
as 3:2010cv03807
Petitioner:
David Shaffer
Respondent:
F. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaffer v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv04210
Plaintiff:
David Shaffer
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shaffer v. State of California et al
as 3:2009cv04226
Petitioner:
David Shaffer
Respondent:
State of California, County of Santa Cruz and Paul M Marigonda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaffer v. County of Santa Cruz
as 2:2009cv01877
Petitioner:
David Shaffer
Respondent:
County of Santa Cruz and Paul M Marigonda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaffer v. State of California et al
as 2:2009cv01543
Petitioner:
David Shaffer
Respondent:
State of California, County of Santa Cruz and Paul M Marigonda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
