Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Smiley v. Glynn County, Georgia et al
as 2:2025cv00001
Defendant:
Glynn County Police Department, Kenneth Miller, Glynn County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
David Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis Jackson v. Carmelino Galang, et al
as 19-16879
Defendant:
EVALYN HOROWITZ, M.D. MCSP, DAVID SMILEY, CEO MCSP, NIKOLAJ WOLFSON, M.D. SJGH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS VAUGHN JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
M. DATOR
(PC) Shockner v. Soltanian et al
as 2:2018cv01948
Defendant:
W. David Smiley, Soltanian, Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Manfred Shockner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vester Patterson v. Sam Do, et al
as 18-16233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM WONG DO, N. HASHEMI, J. CLARK KELSO and others
Shockner v. Soltanian et al
as 4:2018cv03888
Defendant:
W. David Smiley, Dr. Soltanian, Dr. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Manfred Shockner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creddle v. CDCR Healthcare et al
as 2:2018cv01702
Plaintiff:
Michael Frederick Creddle
Defendant:
CDCR Healthcare, Wesley Vaughn, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Jackson v. Carmelino Galang, et al
as 18-15834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS VAUGHN JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARMELINO L. GALANG, M.D. SJGH, NIKOLAJ WOLFSON, M.D. SJGH, DAVID SMILEY, CEO MCSP and others
Tomasini v. Chau et al
as 2:2018cv00286
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Tomasini
Defendant:
James Chau, James Jackson, Christopher Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Dallas Joshua James Myers
Defendant:
Edmund Gerry Brown, David Smiley, Richard Graig Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Bobadilla v. Joe Lizarraga, et al
as 17-17107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY IVAN BOBADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, G. MURPHY, B. COCHRAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
