Cases 1 - 10 of 985
Cadence Bank, N.A. et al v. TMI Consulting Incorporated
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank, N.A. and Esq. David T. Long, Jr.
Defendant:
TMI Consulting Incorporated doing business as Loom Technologies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. David Odom
as 24-1319
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
KIMBERLY B. ODOM
Defendant:
DAVID T. ODOM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Gicharu v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Samuel Kinuthia Gicharu
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Martin O'Malley, David T. Wesling and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burkett v. Washington County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
David T. Burkett
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center and Officer Carty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FTC v. Margaret Cumming
as 24-1288
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MARGARET E. CUMMING, in her capacity as personal representative of the Estate of David T. Cumming
FTC v. Margaret Cumming
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MARGARET E. CUMMING, in her capacity as personal representative of the Estate of David T. Cumming
Schulz et al v Petersen
as 9:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Gary Schulz, David T. Crafton and Valentino Satoshi Vanderbilt
Respondent:
Jeremiah Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
