Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HAMMOND et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
KHALIL HAMMOND, DAVID THOMPSON, ANTOINE WALKER and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL HARRY, GEORGE LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON et al v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON and MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, LT NAJAD, CASRRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VISALDEN-DIAZ et al v. CASAS et al
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
ERIC A. VISALDEN-DIAZ, BRIONNE CUFF, TERRY STOCKS and others
Defendant:
MAXIM CASAS and BECKY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. VAN NESS et al
as 3:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER VAN NESS, LEE BRODOWSKI, ROB ORR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. BARAKA et al
as 2:2023cv04209
Defendant:
RAS J. BARAKA, RAS A. BARAKA, JABRIL PAUL and others
Plaintiff:
JOEL DAVID THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
LEROY THOMPSON, JR.
Defendant:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ALDERMAN HOLDINGS, LLC v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
ALDERMAN HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
OLIVER DAVID THOMPSON and EDWARD P. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
THOMPSON v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
as 2:2017cv03300
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL)
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
USA v. David Thoma
as 17-1349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID THOMAS, aka David Thompson
USA v. David Thoma
as 17-1348
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID THOMAS, aka David Thompson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
