Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Sebastian et al v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kay Sebastian and Michael Dobrzynski
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Davol et al
as 1:2016cv04080
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Coleman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REED v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01194
Plaintiff:
THERESA P. REED
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillispie et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2015cv03031
Plaintiff:
Bruce Willard Gillispie and Sandra Gillispie
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C R Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bickley et al v. CR Bard Inc
as 3:2015cv02198
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bickley and Ronald Bickley
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Novak et al v. Bard, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00221
Plaintiff:
Anthony Novak and Kathleen Smith Novak
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Halverson et al v. Hobeika et al
as 2:2014cv12915
Plaintiff:
Lelanda Halverson and Edward Halverson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Incorporated , Davol Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pallatto et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06325
Plaintiff:
Anna Marie Pallatto and Patrick V. Pallatto
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ekstrom et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv08685
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Ekstrom and William Ekstrom
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Zombro v. Davol Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
Alberta Sue Zombro
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C. R. Bard Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
