Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Williams v. EHCC Record Department et al
as 3:2019cv00440
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Unknown Hooper and EHCC Record Department
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Showers v. City of Bay St. Louis et al
as 1:2019cv00323
Defendant:
Brandon Farve, City of Bay St. Louis, Wesley Malley and others
Plaintiff:
Alvin Showers, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Adams v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv03283
Defendant:
Tommy Duncan, Zurich American Insurance Company, Sysco USA II, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Roundtree et al
as 3:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Christy Sinclair, Unknown Roundtree and Dr. Unknown Singh
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Sysco New Orleans, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01801
Defendant:
Sysco New Orleans, LLC, Tommy Duncan, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Chevaz McClain
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Deangelo Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vicknair et al v. LM General Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv00003
Defendant:
LM General Insurance Company, McDermott, Inc. and State Farm Mutual Autombile Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Vicknair, Jr., Robert DeAngelo, Heidi Vicknair Viola and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv04234
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Oneal Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Swindle v. USA
as 6:2018cv00300
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Deangelo Cortez Swindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeAngelo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02103
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc, Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Edward DeAngelo and Elizabeth DeAngelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
