Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Alfred Adams, Viola Adams, Carl Agostini and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bush et al v. WellPet, LLC
as 1:2021cv10059
Plaintiff:
Marla Bush, Kimberly DeHaven, Monique Salerno and others
Defendant:
WellPet, LLC and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRIGGS et al v. SUBARU OF AMERICA INC.
as 1:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
ELLEN RYDBOM, LORRI L. BRIGGS, LISA DEHAVEN and others
Defendant:
SUBARU OF AMERICA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demory et al v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Howard G. Demory and Charlotte P. Demory
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company , L. James Nichols , Julie K. Dehaven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
3rd Time Trucking, LLC, et al v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, et al
as 3:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
3rd Time Trucking, LLC and Eric W. Custer
Defendant:
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company , L. James Nichols , Kelly Margaret Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Dehaven et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 2:2010at01643
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dehaven and Lisa Dehaven
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A. F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A., and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dehaven et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03039
Plaintiff:
Bradley Dehaven and Lisa Dehaven
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC, Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, NA and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERILMAN v. INTENZO et al
as 1:2007cv03949
Plaintiff:
KEREN PERILMAN
Defendant:
LINDA INTENZO, JOHN DIKMAK, MARGARET NULTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
