Cases 1 - 10 of 38
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13387
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04017
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Deshawn Smith v. Doris Falkenrath
as 22-3237
Petitioner / Appellant:
Deshawn Smith
Respondent / Appellee:
Doris Falkenrath, Superintendent
Smith v. Chilko et al
as 3:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Antonio Deshawn Smith
Defendant:
Officer Chilko, Officer Corneh, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Vannoy et al
as 5:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deshawn Smith
Defendant:
Darrell Vannoy, Monica Carter, William DeRevere and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #786975 v. Drisenga et al
as 1:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Smith #786975
Defendant:
Heidi Drisenga and Brent Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders #305405 et al v. Macauley et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405, Anthony Murphy #769317, Maurice H. Fielding #666102 and others
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Unknown Walzach, Brian Hadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Falkenrath
as 2:2022cv04002
Petitioner:
Deshawn Smith
Respondent:
Doris Falkenrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22249
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09590
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DESHAWN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
