Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Johnson v. Dean Mitchell Auto Mall, LLC
as 1:2016cv00498
Plaintiff:
Betty Johnson
Defendant:
Dean Mitchell Auto Mall, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hitchcock v. Moses Lake, City of et al
as 2:2014cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey S Hitchcock
Defendant:
Moses Lake, City of , Moses Lake Police Department , Dean Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wallace Dean-Mitchell v. Warden
as 13-14111
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALLACE DEAN-MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
In re: Wallace Dean-Mitchell
as 13-12371
Petitioner:
In re: WALLACE DEAN-MITCHELL
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gonzalez v. Moses Lake, City of et al
as 2:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
Juan M Gonzalez
Defendant:
Moses Lake, City of , Moses Lake Police Department , Dean Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wallace Dean-Mitchell v. Patricia Nash, et al
as 11-10710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE DEAN MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA NASH, Correction Counselor USP Coleman, II, personal and professional capacity, a.k.a. Patty Penguin, LT. BROWN, Correction Officer USP Coleman II, personal and professional capacity, T. WEST, Correction Officer USP Coleman II, Personal and professional capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Nash et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Dean Mitchell
Defendant:
Patricia Nash, L. Brown, T. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dean-Mitchell v. Reese et al
as 2:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Wallace Dean-Mitchell
Defendant:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
