Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson v. Sony Pictures Inc.
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Johnson
Defendant:
Sony Pictures Inc. doing business as Crunchyroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson-Brown v. USA
as 4:2023cv13153
Petitioner:
Michael Deangelo Johnson-Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JOHNSON et al v. NEELEY et al
as 1:2023cv01463
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO JOHNSON and SHANGRI STEVENS
Defendant:
ROBERT NEELEY and BONTEMPS TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Johnson v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv01517
Petitioner:
Deangelo Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Deangelo Johnson v. Warden, et al
as 13-15252
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEANGELO JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Alabama Department of Corrections, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, OKALOOSA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Florida and others
Johnson v. Gordy et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Luther Strange, Okaloosa County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Carlton et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv01063
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Johnson
Defendant:
James Carlton and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
