Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Daniels v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv05314
Plaintiff:
Deborah Daniels
Defendant:
United States of America and Lorilee Leilani Letterman
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
DANIELS v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv19544
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DANIELS
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DANIELS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv04237
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DANIELS
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv10178
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION,, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DANIEL EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07031
Plaintiff:
Deborah Daniels
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniels v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv09928
Plaintiff:
Deborah Daniels
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DANIELS v. KLAMO, ESQUIRE et al
as 1:2014cv02415
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DANIELS
Defendant:
JOHN A. KLAMO, ESQUIRE and JOHN A. KLAMO, ESQ., PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deborah Danielle Brubaker v. Marco Fine Arts Inc
as 2:2012cv09608
Plaintiff:
Deborah Danielle Brubaker
Defendant:
Marco Fine Arts Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
