Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 194
In Re: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb
as 24-1318
Appellant: RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS, Trust
Defendant: JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Kurt Kanam v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 24-5121
Petitioner: Kurt Kanam and Pilchuck Nation
Respondent: Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, or his successor, U.S. Department of the Interior and Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, or her successor, U.S. Department of the Interior
State of North Dakota et al v. United States Department of Interior, The et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of Montana, State of Texas and others
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, The, Debra Ann Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, The and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
IN RE: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust v. Webb, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv03094
Not Yet Classified: Rachel Genevieve Powers Trust
Defendant: Jeremiah Darnell Webb, Noah Sencer Robert Barclay, Malakai Levi Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association v. FWS, et al
as 24-5075
Plaintiff: New Mexico Cattle Growers' Association
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior, Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Not Yet Classified: Center for Biological Diversity
Falkirk Mining Company, The v. United States Department of the Interior, The et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Falkirk Mining Company, The
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior, The, Debra Ann Haaland, Bureau of Land Management, The and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276 Interior: Review of Agency Action
ProNM Energy Inc. v. United States Department of Interior et al
as 1:2024cv00293
Plaintiff: ProNM Energy Inc.
Defendant: United States Department of Interior, Debra Anne Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
perkins et al v. garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff: ronald oddelle perkins, Ronald Oddelle Perkins Estate et al., Kanika Glover Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, simon green ceo of the us dept. of ed. et al., United States Department of Education HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as SIMON GREEN, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kurt Kanam, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 24-5003
Plaintiff: Kurt Kanam, in his capacity as Chairman of the Pilchuck Nation and Pilchuck Nation
Defendant: Debra A. Haaland, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs, Darryl LaCounte, in his official capacity as Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?