Cases 1 - 10 of 10
NIEVES JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70902
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS NIEVES JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRITTENDEN et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03195
Plaintiff:
JOSE SIERRA, LAJORDAN CRITTENDEN, DONALD JONES and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crittenden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02182
Plaintiff:
Jose Sierra, Lajordan Crittenden, Donald Jones and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
BURNETTE v. NIEVES et al
as 3:2014cv03642
Plaintiff:
PAUL-JOSEPH: BURNETTE
Defendant:
DENNIS NIEVES, COLIN T. VANDEMARK, JOSEPH REA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernandez v. Executive 2000 Courier Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv20266
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Fernandez
Defendant:
Executive 2000 Courier Systems, Inc. and Dennis Nieves
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
In re: Brucestan Jordan
as 11-4217
Petitioner:
In re: BRUCESTAN T. JORDAN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ANNE MILGRAM, BRUCE KAPLAN and others
Nominal Respondent:
ANNE E THOMPSON
Nieves v. Onondaga County Correctional Facility at Jamesville
as 9:2011cv00136
Petitioner:
Dennis Nieves
Respondent:
Russell Purdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DESLONDE v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY et al
as 3:2010cv06355
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DESLONDE
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY, DONNA BALICK, ROBERT GROVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Burr, II v. Dennis Nieves, et al
as 10-2098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN JACK BURR, II
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS NIEVES, Judge, Superior Court of New Jersey and ATTY GEN NJ
DESLONDE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2009cv03446
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DONNA BALICK, ROBERT GROVER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DESLONDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
