Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Davis v. Dental Department II Building
as 1:2023cv01282
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lee Davis
Defendant:
Dental Department II Building
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Davila v. Hvarre et al
as 3:2023cv02576
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Davila
Defendant:
Warden Hvarre, Debbie Isaacs, Dental Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. HDSP Dental Department et al
as 2:2022cv01971
Plaintiff:
Toney Anthony White, III
Defendant:
HDSP Dental Department, Calvin Johnson, Jeremy Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Polunsky Unit Dental Department et al
as 1:2021cv00368
Plaintiff:
Corey O Mack
Defendant:
Polunsky Unit Dental Department and Gist Unit Dental Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Polunsky Unit Dental Department et al
as 6:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
Corey O Mack
Defendant:
Polunsky Unit Dental Department and Gist Unit Dental Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradford v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2021ct03136
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Wake County Courts, Jail Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Hugh Lee Bradford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL, Warden, SAM A. CROW, Federal judge, J. PHIL GILBERT, Federal judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2020cv03311
Defendant:
Katherine Siereveld, Sarah Canty, Does Dental Department Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCallister v. Davis et al
as 2:2019cv00239
Plaintiff:
David H. McCallister
Defendant:
University of Texas Medical Branch Institution Division, Director's Medical and Dental Department, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rial v. Trueba et al
as 5:2019cv00346
Defendant:
Laundry Department, Mail Room, FNU Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Rial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
