Cases 1 - 10 of 178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Hall v. Kinsey, et al.
as 24-709
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
KATHERINE KINSEY, TARA MULAY, JEAN M. COSTANZA and others
Fields v. Gates et al
as 3:2023cv01412
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
S. Gates, Healthcare Correspondence and Appeals Branch, Policy and Risk Management California Correctional Health Care Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
Melvin Justin Curry
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Andrew Denton, Brian Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Denton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
Misty Denton
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Su et al v. Denton et al
as 2:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Cindy Su and Bryce Ching
Defendant:
Samuel Denton, Denton Wealth Strategies, LLC and Denton Wealth Strategies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Coetzee v. Canepa et al
as 3:2023cv02665
Plaintiff:
Denton Coetzee
Defendant:
Bruce Canepa and Canepa Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC)Denton v. Fisher et al
as 1:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Denton
Defendant:
R. Fisher, S. Torres, R. Boozer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
