Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Harden v. Reed et al
as 4:2023cv04104
Plaintiff:
Deon Harden
Defendant:
Peyton Reed, Tracey Smith, Jailer Peyton Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Al v. Oklahoma, State of et al
as 4:2021cv01135
Plaintiff:
Alaahcontayna Al and Antonio Deon Hollway
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of, Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Bar Foundation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Think Rubix LLC v. Be Woke.Vote et al
as 4:2021cv00004
Defendant:
CLIMB Organization LLC, Hyper Engine LLC, Robert F Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Think Rubix LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
McKellar v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00655
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Deon McKellar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00326
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Deone Lee and Davey Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tiger v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Nikki Carter and Jackson County Jail
Plaintiff:
David Deon Tiger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Martin v. Moyster et al
as 4:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Bruce Moyster, Mike Davis, Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Deon A Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woolsey et al v. Blytheville Arkansas, City of
as 3:2019cv00377
Plaintiff:
Rodney Duncan, Chris Holifield, Dennis Massey and others
Defendant:
Blytheville Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
