Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Knutson v. Department of the Army et al
as 2:2017cv01997
Plaintiff:
Ronald Knutson
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Criminal Investigation Division of the Department of the Army and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durr v. United States et al
as 1:2016cv10238
Defendant:
United States, Department of the Army and Office of the Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Stephen Durr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis #195873 v. United States Department of the Army et al
as 2:2016cv01377
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army, Unknown Parties, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWitt v. US Department of the Army
as 3:2016cv00484
Plaintiff:
Melvin DeWitt
Defendant:
US Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01341
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-6379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marvin Deal v. USA, et al
as 14-5216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Glenn Deal
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Executive Office of the President, United States Department of Defense and others
DEAL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2014cv01103
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GLENN DEAL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Department of the Army
as 5:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Robert Derwin Avery
Defendant:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Department of the Army
as 3:2013cv00643
Petitioner:
Helda Wilson
Respondent:
Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
