Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Pinzon v. U.S. Dept. Health & Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Abraham Pinzon
Defendant:
U.S. Dept. Health & Human Services, CA. Dept. Health Care Svcs. and Mendocino County Health & Human Svcs. Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Don Payne v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 23-5131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Don Albert Payne
Defendant / Appellee:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Dept. Health & Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, CMS Administrator, Centers Medicare & Medicaid SVCS and Marisa M. Smith, Regional Manager, Office Civil Rights S.W. Region, U.S. Dept. Health & Human Services
Fogel v. Dept. Health & Human Services
as 1:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Dept. Health & Human Services
Plaintiff:
Mindy Fogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maher, Scott v. Wisconsin Dept. Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2018cv01061
Plaintiff:
Scott Maher
Defendant:
Doug Bellile, Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center and Wisconsin Dept. Health & Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
David Carmichael v. Kathleen Sebeliu
as 13-2546
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ALAN CARMICHAEL
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary U.S. Dept. Health & Human Services, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, and its officers named herein acting in their official capacity under the color of State Law and CAROLYN W. COLVIN, in her official capacity as Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Willis v. United States Dept Health + Human Service
as 1:2012cv01463
Plaintiff:
Walter Willis
Defendant:
United States Dept Health + Human Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Young v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
James A. Young
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Energy Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
