Cases 1 - 10 of 40
HIGDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03062
Plaintiff:
DEREK JAMES HIGDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HIGDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00919
Plaintiff:
DEREK JAMES HIGDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Biaselli v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00278
Petitioner:
Derek James Biaselli
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Biaselli v. Clark
as 2:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Derek James Biaselli
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evenstad v. Lynden et al
as 0:2023cv00498
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Defendant:
Tom Lynden, A.J. Lague, Eric Chaleaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELSH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23960
Plaintiff:
DEREK JAMES WELSH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
VALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION v. GRAHAM et al
as 2:2022cv01876
Plaintiff:
VALLEY FORGE MILITARY ACADEMY FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DEREK JAMES GRAHAM and SCOTT KEITH NEWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
James et al v. Progressive Property Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Derek James and Jobie James
Defendant:
Progressive Property Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
US v. Derek Johnson
as 21-4280
Defendant / Appellant:
DEREK JAMES JOHNSON, a/k/a Furman Daniels
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
