Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Derrick StokesIn re: Derrick Stokes
as 24-60129
Petitioner: In re: Derrick Stokes
Stokes v. Jackson
as 3:2023cv03169
Plaintiff: Derrick Stokes
Defendant: Warden Donald Jackson
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derrick Kenyatta Stokes v. Don Barnes We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2022cv01608
Petitioner: Derrick Kenyatta Stokes and Derrick Stokes
Respondent: Don Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Richardson v. David Davis, et al
as 22-12644
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee: SHERIFF OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY, DAVID DAVIS, MACON-BIBB COUNTY and others
RICHARDSON v. DAVIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00320
Defendant: SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, Deputy Lawrence Prichard, Deputy Devin Keith and others
Plaintiff: Christopher M Richardson, ATTORNEY DEBRA G GOMEZ and CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ULYSSE v. STOKES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01465
Defendant: DERRICK STOKES and NADIM AL-HINAWI
Plaintiff: HUGUETTE ULYSSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Stokes v. Barnes et al
as 8:2019cv00171
Defendant: Sheriff Barnes, Parker and Deputy A. Bright
Plaintiff: Derrick Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Barnes et al
as 3:2019cv00162
Defendant: Sheriff Barnes, ., Deputy A. Bright and Deputy Parker
Plaintiff: Derrick Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stokes v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2014cv00150
Plaintiff: Derrick Stokes
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Derrick Stokes v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 13-4775
Plaintiff - Appellant: DERRICK STOKES
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?