Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Marshall v. Calumet City et al
as 1:2023cv04325
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Marshall
Defendant:
Calumet City, Detective B. Begeske, Star No. 253 and Unknown and Unnamed Calumet City Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. PVH Corp.
as 22-2738
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cameron Warren
Defendant:
PVH Corp., Stephan Larsson, Ben Preuss and others
Warren v. PVH Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
Cameron Warren
Defendant:
PVH Corp., Stephan Larsson, Ben Preuss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Huskins v. Bennett et al
as 4:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Gist Huskins
Defendant:
Detective L. Bennett and Detective B. Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AHMAD v. NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv19996
Plaintiff:
AHMAD ZAKARIYYA and ZAKARIYYA AHMAD
Defendant:
NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Luedtke et al
as 3:2018cv01259
Defendant:
Detective B. Luedtke and Jonathan D. Sacks
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirkland v. Leudthke et al
as 3:2018cv00940
Defendant:
Rachel Demers, Detective B. Leudthke and B. Luedtke
Plaintiff:
Rashod Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel A. Jaime-Gonzalez v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv06600
Defendant:
Officer Ramierez, California Highway Patrol, Wendy Lofton and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel A. Jaime-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren Pratcher v. Lieutenant McCollum, et al
as 17-5761
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN PRATCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT MCCOLLUM, DETECTIVE WILLIAM ACRED, DETECTIVE JONATHAN OVERLY and others
Forte v. McNellis et al
as 1:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
Daniel Forte
Defendant:
Detective B. McNellis, Detective Garrity and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
