Cases 1 - 10 of 347
Arnold v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11776
Defendant:
Brian Bassin, Benjamin P. Brooks, Jr., CoreLogic and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Darnell Arnold
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lachan v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv06041
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Deven Chandra Lachan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lachan v. Target Corporation
as 3:2024cv06048
Plaintiff:
Deven Chandra Lachan
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dunlap v. Warden FMC Devens
as 1:2024cv11462
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Respondent:
Warden FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alejandro Nunez et al v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv06414
Plaintiff:
Mozhgan Samiei, Jesus Perez, Cecilia Valenzuela and others
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES U.S.A., INC., a California corporation and First Element, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Antitrust Litigation
Deven-Hernandez v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Deven-Hernandez
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Block v. Boncher, et al
as 24-1530
Defendant:
GREG BRESLIN, in his official capacity as Acting Warden at FTC Oklahoma, DR. LUND, acting Medical Care Provider for petitioner at FMC Devens, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, (BOP) and others
Plaintiff:
WAYLEN BLOCK
Dunlap v. F.J Bowers
as 1:2024cv11587
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Respondent:
F.J Bowers and FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Noble v. Napier
as 24-1377
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
