Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Schultz v. The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
as 3:2026cv01044
Plaintiff:
Devin R. Schultz
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Dixon v. James Conway, et al
as 26-3663
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDMUND DIXON
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES W. CONWAY, PROSECUTOR JAMES JOEL SITTERLY, DEVIN JOHN WILLIAMS and others
In re: Devin Coleman
as 26-2747
Petitioner:
In re: DEVIN L. COLEMAN
Respondent:
WILLIAM NGWA, Provider at JTVCC, JASVIR KAUR, Provider at Howard R. Young Correctional Institute "HRYCI", SHATYRA HENDERSON-HAMWRIGHT, Provider at HRYCI and others
HYMAN v. SMITH et al
as 1:2026cv00689
Plaintiff:
DEVIN M. HYMAN
Defendant:
TAMEKA SMITH, MS. BASS and AD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drayton v. Callister-Dean et al
as 2:2026cv02902
Plaintiff:
Robert Seleste Drayton
Defendant:
Mrs. McCallister-Dean, Mrs. S. Harvin, Captain T. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lastrapes v. Guillory et al
as 2:2026cv02582
Plaintiff:
Jau'Bari Lastrapes
Defendant:
Stitch Guillory, Carlton Finn and Devin Cornett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Devin Tryan LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00234
Plaintiff:
Micah Zimmerman
Defendant:
Devin Tryan LLC doing business as Pineapple Homes Team of Exp Realty and Devin Tryan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Pinkerton et al v. Reinhardt et al
as 8:2026cv02021
Petitioner:
Krstafer Pinkerton, I, Danielle Jenkins, Timothy Jenkins and others
Respondent:
Debra Reinhardt, CEOMC, FL. INC, Resource Property Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brown v. Dunn et al
as 2:2026cv01542
Plaintiff:
Larona Brown
Defendant:
Devin Dunn and Retail Services WiS Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
