Cases 11 - 17 of 17
CCO INVESTMENT SERVICES CORP. v. DICARLO et al
as 2:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
CCO INVESTMENT SERVICES CORP.
Defendant:
CARMELLA DICARLO, RONALD DICARLO, RICHARD DICARLO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
DICARLO v. BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv05779
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DICARLO
Defendant:
BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and ABC CORPORATION 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Automobile Insurance v. Security Income Planners & Com
as 12-1595
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
American Automobile Insurance Company, a Missouri Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Security Income Planners & Company, LLC, A New York Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
Jay Hoffman, an individual, Jacqueline Voliano, an Individual, Michelle Peck, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Christopher Sommaruga, an Individual, Maria Gross, Marianna Cerulli and others
Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company v. Bartholomew et al
as 2:2012cv02752
Defendant:
Howard B Abbott, Howard B Abbott, Joseph Bartholomew and others
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Corbett et al v. American Legal Funding, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00773
Defendant:
American Legal Funding, LLC, Dr. Joseph Aprile, Armenia Surgery Center and others
Plaintiff:
Avant & Mitchell, P.C. and Lisa Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
DiCarlo et al v. C.S.C.S., Inc et al
as 1:2009cv11370
Plaintiff:
Florindo DiCarlo and M.F.D. Realty Trust
Defendant:
C.S.C.S., Inc, C.S.C.S., Inc, Cast Stone Commercial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hi-Tech Electronic v. DiCarlo Associates
as 8:2000cv02217
Plaintiff:
Hi-Tech Electronic Displays, Inc.
Defendant:
DiCarlo Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
