Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CLARK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv05338
Plaintiff:
DIANNE CLARK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2023cv02210
Plaintiff:
Heather Dianne Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barlow et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2018cv11281
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barlow , Kent Barton , Battiste Paul and others
Defendant:
Richard Dale Snyder , Flint, City of , Receivership Transition Advisory Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch et al v. City Of New York
as 1:2016cv05677
Plaintiff:
Norma Lynch , Edith Adams , Dorthea Andrews and others
Defendant:
City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 207
Felton et al v. Restoration et al
as 1:2015cv00400
Defendant:
AR&R Security, Adult Protective Service, James Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Felton, Jean Doar 1-100 and John Doar 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carroll Dianne Clark v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2013cv09355
Plaintiff:
Carroll Dianne Clark
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Clark v. United States Of America
as 6:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Tracee Dianne Clark
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hernandez et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 2:2009cv08506
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jenell Hernandez, Jenell Hernandez, William Hernandez, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
