Cases 1 - 7 of 7
James Arunga, et al v. American Civil Liberties Union, et al
as 09-35947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES AGGREY-KWEGGYIR ARUNGA and DOREEN H. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, NICOLE OZER and others
James Arunga, et al v. American Civil Liberties Union, et al
as 09-16423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. ARUNGA and DOREEN H. LEE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, NICOLE OZER, Technology and Civil Liberties Policy Director, ACLU, Northern CA, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and others
Arunga et al v. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al
as 6:2009cv06175
Plaintiff:
James Aggrey-Kweggyir Arunga and Doreen H. Lee
Defendant:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, Nicole Ozer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Giorgis et al v. Ogden et al
as 2:2009cv01174
Plaintiff:
Araya Wolde Giorgis and Ida Araya
Defendant:
John C. Ogden, Steve Betts, Sean Stechenfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Arunga et al v. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al
as 2:2008cv02525
Plaintiff:
James AggreyKweggyirr Arunga and Doreen H. Lee
Defendant:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Nicole Ozer, American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arunga v. Clinton et al
as 3:2007cv00382
Plaintiff:
James Aggrey- Kweggyirr Arunga
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Reid-Schumer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hancock et al v. Dick James Ford Co.
as 1:2007cv03145
Plaintiff:
Terrence J Hancock, Terrence J Hancock, Lawrence Groot and others
Defendant:
Dick James Ford Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
