Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Jones-El v. Stange et al
as 1:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Eugene K. Jones-El
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Ian Wallace, Paula Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson et al v. Raven Industries, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
James Dickerson and Kathleen Dickerson
Defendant:
Raven Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moon v. Jordan et al
as 1:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wesly Moon
Defendant:
John Jordan, James Mulcahy, T. C. Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esposito v. Nixon et al
as 2:2015cv04073
Plaintiff:
Vincent J Esposito
Defendant:
Jay Nixon, George Lombardi, Jason Kander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Phillips et al
as 1:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Manuel
Defendant:
Paula Phillips, Unknown Warden, Unknown Beggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H. et al v. St. Louis County, Missouri et al
as 4:2014cv02069
Plaintiff:
A. H. , B. H. , Caitlin Dickerson and others
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Missouri, Jon Belmar and Herbert Bernsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02021
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thurman
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Scotty Clark, Unknown Engler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2014cv01953
Plaintiff:
Peggy Dunn , Theresa Archie , Delia Armendariz and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer v. Pash et al
as 5:2014cv06051
Plaintiff:
Randy G Spencer
Defendant:
Ronda Pash, Lori Lakey, Matameyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harker v. Jordan et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Harker
Defendant:
John Jordan, Ruth A. Dickerson, Bud Proffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
