Cases 61 - 70 of 279
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00877
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Dickerson v. JSS Janitorial Services & Supplies, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02589
Defendant:
ISS Facility Services, Inc. and JSS Janitorial Services & Supplies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Dickerson
Not Yet Classified:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickerson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03562
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jeremy J. Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan Winston, Jr. v. Shelby County, TN, et al
as 19-5798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN WINSTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SHELBY COUNTY, TN, OFFICER [UNKNOWN] BRADFELID and OFFICER [UNKNOWN] DICKERSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2019cv02168
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Petitioner:
Richard Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robertson et al v. Breakthrough Towing, LLC
as 2:2019cv10266
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, Breakthrough Towing, LLC, Michael Dickerson and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bates, Olivia Robertson and Leng Vang
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Dickerson v. Springfield, City of
as 3:2018cv01345
Plaintiff:
Jordan Dickerson
Defendant:
Springfield, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Magyar et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2018cv13447
Defendant:
National Association of Letter Carriers and its Michigan Affiliate, Branch 1, John Dickerson, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Magyar and Klay Magyar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
