Cases 1 - 7 of 7
v. Dine Development Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00883
Defendant:
Dine Development Corporation and Sarah Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Butrick v. Dine Development Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Shannon N. Butrick
Defendant:
Dine Development Corporation and Sarah Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 sp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Urban Outfitters, et al v. Navajo Nation, et al
as 15-701
Petitioner:
URBAN OUTFITTERS, INC., URBAN OUTFITTERS WHOLESALE, INC., ANTHROPOLOGIE, INC and others
Respondent:
THE NAVAJO NATION, a sovergin Indian Nation, DINE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a corporation wholly-owned by and formed under the laws of the Navajo Nation and NAVAJO ARTS AND CRAFTS ENTERPRISE, a wholly-owned instrumentality of the Navajo Nation
The Navajo Nation et al v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. et al
as 1:2014mc00772
Defendant:
Anthropologie, Inc., Anthropologie.com, L.L.C., Free People of PA, L.L.C. and others
Movant:
Anthropologie, Inc., Free People of PA, L.L.C., Native American Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dine Development Corporation, Navajo Arts and Crafts Enterprise and The Navajo Nation
Respondent:
Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc. and Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Navajo Nation, The, et al. v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00195
Plaintiff:
Navajo Nation, The , Dine Development Corporation and Navajo Arts and Crafts Enterprise
Defendant:
Urban Outfitters, Inc., Urbanoutfitters.Com, L.P., Urban Outfitters Wholesale, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
