Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Hatten v. Taronis Technologies, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00877
Defendant:
Kevin Pollack, Ermanno P Santilli, William W Staunton and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hatten
Hatten v. Taronis Technologies Inc et al
as 8:2019cv00876
Defendant:
Kevin Pollack, Ermanno P Santilli, William W Staunton and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Hatten
Dingess v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02953
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James Dingess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morgan v. Logan County Commission et al
as 2:2018cv01450
Defendant:
Officer J. D. Tincher, Logan County Sheriff Sonya M. Dingess-Porter, Logan County Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DINGESS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv03686
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC")
Plaintiff:
TONI DINGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DINGESS v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv09756
Plaintiff:
FANNIE DINGESS
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott et al v. GGNSC Vanceburg, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv00014
Defendant:
GGNSC Vanceburg, LLC , GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC , GGNSC Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Almeida v. GGNSC Vanceburg, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Joseph Almeida
Defendant:
GGNSC Vanceburg, LLC , GPH Vanceburg, LLC , GGNSC Administrative Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dingess v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11228
Plaintiff:
Debbie C. Dingess
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dingess v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07838
Plaintiff:
Lois Dingess
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
