Cases 31 - 40 of 436
BOARDLEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR et al
as 1:2007cv01986
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOARDLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, DIRK KEMPTHORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
County of Sacramento, et al v. Dorothy Andrews, et al
as 10-80062
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WILTON MIWOK RANCHERIA, a formerly federally-recognized Indian Tribe, Its Members, ME-WUK INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE WILTON RANCHERIA and DOROTHY ANDREWS
Defendant - Respondent:
DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary of the Department of Interior, CARL J. ARTMAN, Assistant SEcretary of for Indian Affairs of the United States Department of Interior, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Petitioner:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA and CITY OF ELK GROVE, CALIFORNIA
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, et al
as 10-3060
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary, United States Department of the Interior and GEORGE SKIBINE, Assistant Secretary of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs
Me-Wuk Indian Community of the Wilton Rancheria et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 5:2007cv05706
Plaintiff:
Me-Wuk Indian Community of the Wilton Rancheria
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne , Carl J. Artman , United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor_dft:
County of Sacramento, California and City of Elk Grove
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
James McPheters v. State of Idaho, et al
as 10-35020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. MCPHETERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF IDAHO, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, J. D. BURKE and others
Elouise Cobell, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 09-5430
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elouise Pepion Cobell, Earl Old Person, Mildred Cleghorn and others
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary of the Interior, Kevin Gover, Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Department of Interior and others
Intrepid Potash-NM, LLC v. U. S. Dep't of the Interior, et al.
as 1:2009cv01135
Plaintiff:
Intrepid Potash-New Mexico, LLC, Intrepid Potash-New Mexico, LLC and Intrepid Potash-New Mexico, LLC
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Dirk Kempthorne and United States Bureau of Land Management
Movant:
Yates Petroleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Quapaw Tribe of OK, et al v. Asarco Incorporated, et al
as 4:2003cv00846
Plaintiff:
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, The , John L Berrey , Colleen Wilson Austin and others
Defendant:
Blue Tee Corporation , Childress Royalty Company , Doe Run Resources Corporation, The and others
Counter_claimant:
Blue Tee Corporation , Gold Fields Mining Corporation , Doe Run Resources Corporation, The and others
Counter_defendant:
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, The, Colleen Wilson Austin, Edwina Faye Busby and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Blue Tee Corporation , Gold Fields Mining Corporation and Doe Run Resources Corporation, The
Third_party_defendant:
United States of America , Billye D Albright, James E Gilmore and others
Cross_claimant:
Childress Royalty Company , Blue Tee Corporation , Gold Fields Mining Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
United States of America , Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company , Colleen Wilson Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Armstrong v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009cv08144
Plaintiff:
Brian Armstrong
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elton Inc et al v. Dick Kempthorne et al
as 5:2008cv00520
Defendant:
Frank Campos, Does, Gold Capital Investment Corporation, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Elton Inc and Elton Nixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409 (a) Quiet Title Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
