Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Baxter et al v. Dirty World, LLC
as 2:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Baxter and Linda Baxter
Defendant:
Dirty World, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
BWP Media USA Incorporated v. Dirty World LLC
as 2:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
BWP Media USA Incorporated
Defendant:
Dirty World LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Unni Menon v. Dirty World LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05688
Defendant:
Dirty World LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Unni Menon
Sarah Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment, et al
as 13-5946
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH JONES
Defendant:
DIRTY WORLD ENTERTAINMENT RECORDINGS LLC, dba Thedirt.com and DIRTY WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, dba Thedirty.com
Defendant - Appellant:
HOOMAN KARAMIAN, aka Nik Richie, aka Corbin Grimes and DIRTY WORLD, LLC, dba Thedirty.com
Sam Argyropoulus v. Dirty World, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv08741
Plaintiff:
Sam Argyropoulus
Defendant:
Dirty World, LLC and Does
Vejsiu v. Karamian et al
as 5:2012cv00697
Plaintiff:
Joni Vejsiu
Defendant:
Hooman Karamian, James Grdina, John Grdina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarah Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Reco, et al
as 12-5133
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SARAH JONES
Defendant:
DIRTY WORLD ENTERTAINMENT RECORDINGS LLC, dba Thedirt.com and DIRTY WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, dba Thedirty.com
Defendant - Appellant:
HOOMAN KARAMIAN, aka Nik Richie, aka Corbin Grimes and DIRTY WORLD, LLC, dba Thedirty.com
C. v. Dirty World, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00392
Defendant:
Dirty World, LLC and Nik Richie
Plaintiff:
S. C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hare v. Richie et al
as 1:2011cv03488
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harvey Hare
Defendant:
Nik Richie, Dirty, Inc., The Dirty, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Gauck v. Karamian et al
as 2:2011cv02346
Defendant:
Hooman Karamian , Dirty World, LLC , DIRTY, INC and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren Lee Gauck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
