Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Humbert v. Marshall et al
as 3:2026cv02040
Plaintiff:
Eric Humbert
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Michael Pugh, Marrcus Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Schaefer v. Wilson
as 26-40252
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Doctor William Wilson, Unit Officer Vanatti, Unknown Named Unit Officer, Terre Hunte U.S.P. "B-2 Unit" and others
Schaefer v. Wilson et al
as 2:2026cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Schaefer
Defendant:
Doctor William Wilson, Dr. Roco, Unit Officer Vanatti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyd v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2023cv06364
Plaintiff:
James Boyd
Defendant:
Superintendent J. Wolcott, Jane Doe's, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durham v. Ankura Consulting Group
as 23-60283
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Medical Doctor William H. Durham and William H. Durham, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
Ankura Consulting Group, L.L.C. and John Does 1-5
MORANT v. CATTELL et al
as 5:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ELLIOTT MORANT, SR., SHAWN MOE and MOE
Defendant:
DOCTOR WILLIAM CATTELL, MRS. SHAYNE GOODMAN, RN, MRS. JESSECA LORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thatcher v. State of Texas
as 22-50862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albert Richard Thatcher
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, McLennan County, Texas, McLennan County Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-60460
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Boyd v. King
as 22-60104
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dean C. Boyd
Defendant / Appellee:
Ronald King, Mississippi Correctional Facility Superintendent, in his Individual and Official Capacity and Doctor William Brazier
Temujin Kensu v. MDOC, et al
as 21-1802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, DAN HEYNS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
