Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Chennette et al v. Porch.com et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Nathan Chennette, Larry Akins, Gary Alger and others
Defendant:
Porch.com, GoSmith Inc, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dodgson v. Pereira et al
as 1:2022cv21318
Plaintiff:
Ryan Dodgson
Defendant:
Paul Pereira, Dennis McIntosh, Charles Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 Securities Exchange Act
Nathan Chennette, et al v. Porch.com, Inc., et al
as 20-35962
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KYLE ROBB, NATHAN CHENNETTE, SCOTT GLUBAY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENTON MARRELLI, MATTHEW EHRLICHMAN, GOSMITH INC. and others
Chennette v. Porch.com et al
as 1:2020cv00201
Plaintiff:
Nick Miller, David Frost, Adam Byerley and others
Defendant:
GoSmith Inc., Brenton Marrelli, Matthew Ehrlichman and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Dodgson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2018cv05178
Plaintiff:
Julie Dodgson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01894
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Abad et al v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company et al
as 7:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Gabriel, Marlow Hilton, Alexander Abad and others
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Davis et al v. McMillan et al
as 1:2014cv00024
Plaintiff:
Anthony Davis, Gary Williams and Jordan Lytton
Defendant:
Robert McMillan, Blume, Dodgson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
