Cases 41 - 50 of 12,658
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.11.1.125
as 2:2024cv01757
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.11.1.125
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LOMBARDO V. ZANELLI, ET AL
as 5:2024cv01806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE AMY ZANELLI, ANDREW YOST, MATTHEW STEIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
COLON-TORRES v. SERRANO et al
as 5:2024cv01745
Defendant:
ZEISLOFT TRUCKING, LLC, OCTAVIO SERRANO, CHARLES D. ZEISLOFT TRUCKING and others
Plaintiff:
HERIBERTO COLON-TORRES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Fulmer v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Susan Fulmer
Defendant:
John Doe and Michelle I. Zatizabal
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JENKINS v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JANET L JENKINS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, Warden PHILLIP SHAFFER, Doctor JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
