Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Brainerd v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brainerd v. Ward, et al
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Lt. Ontravarious, Chief Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McNoel v. The Waters of Fort Smith, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02140
Plaintiff:
Anna McNoel
Defendant:
The Waters of Fort Smith, LLC and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Criswell v. Wright et al
as 4:2021cv00537
Defendant:
Winston, O'Neal, Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Criswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hakim X v. Straughn et al
as 5:2019cv00283
Defendant:
William Straughn, Kenneth D Starks, John Haynes and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Romes/Ibrahim Hakim X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKee v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 6:2018cv06117
Defendant:
Jane Does Nurses 1-5, Correct Care Solutions, LLC, John Does Doctors 6-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Martha McKee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Stockdale et al
as 6:2017cv06064
Plaintiff:
Alton Ray Robertson, Jr.
Defendant:
Tim Stockdale, John Doe, John Doe 1-2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. Good Samaritan Insurance Co., LTD et al
as 3:2016cv03061
Plaintiff:
Ron Dawkins
Defendant:
Good Samaritan Insurance Co., LTD and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rabon et al v. Kimani et al
as 4:2016cv04007
Plaintiff:
Terrance Rabon and Kathleen Rabon
Defendant:
John K. Kimani, Tolyn Express, LLC and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Georgia-Pacific Chemicals LLC v. Augmentus North America LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01046
Plaintiff:
Georgia-Pacific Chemicals LLC
Defendant:
Augmentus North America LLC, Augmentus Group LLC, Augmentus LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
