Cases 1 - 10 of 3,255
Alves v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 1:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Cindy Alves
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, Acting Commissioner ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, NYS Office of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Doe, et al v. City of Boston, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and JAMES DOE
Defendant:
BOSTON, MA, PAUL EVANS, individually, ROBERT DUNFORD, individually and others
Julia James on behalf of her infant daughter G.E. v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Julia James on behalf of her infant daughter G.E.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 1:2024cv03283
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castaneda v. State of Nevada
as 24-50328
Plaintiff:
Rudy Castaneda
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Does 1-5, Inclusive, Joni Abraham and others
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Blair v. Stone County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harleen Blair
Defendant:
Stone County, Mississippi, Mike Farmer, Philip L. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
