Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Berman v. Paul Scott, et al
as 23-3062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John L. Berman
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Douglas Scott and John Does, 1-50
Berman v. Scott et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
John Lawrence Berman
Defendant:
Paul Scott, John Does 1-50 and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Velder Williams v. Chad Westrum, et al
as 23-1704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Velder Orlando Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Westrum, Individual Capacity and Dalton, Individual Capacity
Defendant:
Bulter, Individual Capacity, McClure, Individual Capacity, Gross, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Qualls v. Russellville, City of et al
as 4:2021cv01073
Plaintiff:
David Qualls
Defendant:
Russellville Arkansas, City of, J Richardson, K Cromer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Westrum et al
as 4:2021cv04163
Plaintiff:
Velder O. Williams
Defendant:
Chad Westrum, Dalton, Bulter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wann v. Ohio Casualty Insurance et al
as 4:2018cv00833
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Wann
Defendant:
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Darlene Wann, Sheila Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicklas, et al v. Kelly, et al
as 4:2017cv03131
Defendant:
John Does (1-50), Joe Kelly and Lancaster County Attorney
Plaintiff:
Michelle Nicklas, Jane Roes (1-50) and John Roes (1-50)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
