Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Doe John
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe John
as 4:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Doe John
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Norman v. Jane Doe/John Doe
as 1:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Norman
Defendant:
Jane Doe/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Rosch et al
as 7:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Winston NaJee Reed
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Harold Clarke, Warden Jeffery Kiezer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wang v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Plaintiff:
Shuiying Wang
Defendant:
Doe John, 016.com, 100700.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark (Anticybersquatting consumer protection)
Powers v. Anne Arundel County Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
Carlton Powers
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County Maryland, STATE OF MARYLAND, Tfc. Matthew Milich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Sprout Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. John Doe
as 5:2021cv00127
Plaintiff:
Sprout Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Doe John and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Bruce et al v. Homebridge Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv03236
Plaintiff:
Audrey Bruce and Willie Bruce
Defendant:
Homebridge Financial Services, Inc., NewRez, LLC, Cyprexx Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jane Doe #2 v. Charles County Board of Education et al
as 8:2019cv02050
Defendant:
Kenneth Schroeck, Board of Education of Charles County, Carlos D. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe/John Doe #2 and Jane Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2014cv01752
Plaintiff:
Malibu Media, LLC
Defendant:
Doe John
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
