Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Bradford Perry v. Calvin Broadus Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv02212
Plaintiff:
Bradford Perry an individual doing business as StarfieldStudio
Defendant:
Calvin Broadus, Jr. individually doing business as Snoop Dogg and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Thomas (PS) et al v. CDOC
as 1:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
LL Cool J, Ice Cube, Jay-Z and others
Defendant:
CDOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.
as 23-2018
Appellant:
MAD DOGG ATHLETICS, INC.
Appellee:
PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.
Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.
as 23-2020
Appellant:
MAD DOGG ATHLETICS, INC.
Appellee:
PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC.
VALENTINE-SHABAZZ v. SINACOLA et al
as 2:2022cv03342
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN VALENTINE-SHABAZZ
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SINACOLA, BRITTANY PEETCHATKA, REGINALD JOSEPH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Jane Doe v. Calvin Broadus et al
as 2:2022cv04952
Petitioner:
Jane Doe, Calvin Broadus and DONALD CAMPBELL
Defendant:
Snoop Dogg and Bishop Don Magic Juan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Peloton Interactive, Inc. v. Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.
as 2:2022mc00125
Petitioner:
Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Respondent:
Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.
Jane Doe v. Calvin Broadus et al
as 2:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Calvin Broadus, Donald Campbell, GERBER & CO, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00251
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
